Pharmacovigilance des médicaments et des vaccins contre la COVID-19 durant la pandémie: comment le Réseau français des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance a relevé le défi?

Résumé La pandémie secondaire au virus SARS-CoV2 s'est traduite, pour la pharmacovigilance institutionnelle française, par une « crise sanitaire » en 2 temps : la phase coronavirus disease 2019 - « COVID-19 » pendant laquelle les missions des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance (CRPV) étaient de détecter un impact des médicaments sur cette maladie, qu'il s'agisse du rôle éventuellement aggravant de certains médicaments ou d'une modification du profil de sécurité de médicaments utilisés pour la prise en charge de la COVID-19. La seconde phase a fait suite à la mise à disposition des vaccins contre la COVID-19, pendant laquelle les missions des CRPV étaient de détecter le plus précocement possible, tout nouvel effet indésirable grave, source d'un potentiel signal qui modifierait le rapport bénéfices/risques d'un vaccin et nécessiterait la mise en place de mesures de sécurité sanitaire. Pendant ces 2 périodes, la détection de signal est restée le cœur de métier des CRPV. Les CRPV ont du s'organiser pour prendre en charge l'augmentation historique de la volumétrie de déclarations et de demandes d'avis. Les CRPV en charge du suivi des vaccins ont fait face à une activité démesurée sur une longue durée, afin de synthétiser l'ensemble des déclarations, d'identifier, en temps réel, l'émergence de signaux et de produire un rapport hebdomadaire. L'organisation nationale mise en place avec l'Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé a permis de relever le challenge que représentait un tel suivi instantané des vaccins. Le Réseau français des CRPV a su s'adapter en faisant preuve d'agilité et de flexibilité et en démontrant son efficacité dans la détection précoce de signaux. Cette crise a également confirmé la supériorité de la détection manuelle/humaine des signaux en terme de puissance et d'efficience pour détecter rapidement un nouvel effet indésirable médicamenteux et prendre rapidement des mesures de réduction du risque. Pour maintenir la performance des CRPV français dans la détection de tels signaux et surveiller tous les médicaments comme ils doivent l'être un nouveau modèle de financement permettant de corriger l'inadéquation des moyens d'expertise des CRPV au regard de la volumétrie des déclarations est maintenant nécessaire.

Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: A win-win bet with Health Authorities!

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic virus was a "health crisis" and a significant burden also for the French pharmacovigilance system. It took its toll in 2 phases, the first being in early 2020 when very little was known, and during which the missions of the 31 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers (RPVCs) from university hospitals were to detect adverse reactions of drugs used in the context of the disease. Whether as a possible aggravating role on COVID-19, or displaying a different safety profile during its course, or to assess safety of curative treatment, this phase preceded that of the arrival of dedicated vaccines. Then the RPVCs' missions were to detect, as early as possible, any new serious adverse effect leading to a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two distinct periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. Each RPVC had to organize itself to handle an unprecedented surge of declarations and requests for advice, from health care professionals and patients alike. "Leading" RPVCs, who were in charge of monitoring vaccines, had to deal with an extraordinary workload (still going on to this date), to generate in real-time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as well as an extended analysis of the different safety signals. The organization put in place at the beginning of the health crisis, adapted to the context of the vaccines, allowed to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring, and to identify many safety signals. Efficient "short-circuits exchanges" with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers Network (RPVCN) were paramount to the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The French RPVCN has shown at this occasion both agility and flexibility, swiftly adapting to vaccine- and media-related unrest, and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis also confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection over automated ones, as the most effective and powerful tool to date to rapidly detect and validate a new ADR and enable to elaborate rapid risk reduction measures. To maintain the performance of French RPVCN in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should, and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model should be considered.

[Monitoring the safety of drugs and COVID-19 vaccines by the French Pharmacovigilance Centers during the pandemic: a win-win bet with Health Authorities!] / Pharmacovigilance des médicaments et des vaccins contre la COVID-19 durant la pandémie : comment le Réseau français des centres régionaux de pharmacovigilance a relevé le défi ?

The pandemic subsequent to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus resulted, for the French institutional pharmacovigilance, in a "health crisis" in 2 phases: the coronavirus disease 2019 - "COVID-19" phase during which the missions of the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres (RPVC) were to detect a possible impact of drugs on this disease, as whether existed a possible aggravating role of certain drugs, or the safety profile of drugs used for the management of COVID-19 could evolve. The second phase followed the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, during which the RPVCs' missions were to detect as early as possible any new serious adverse effect, source of a potential signal that would modify the benefit/risk ratio of a vaccine and require the implementation of health safety measures. During these two periods, signal detection remained the core business of the RPVCs. The RPVCs had to organize themselves to handle an historical surge of declarations and requests for advice, whereas the RPVCs in charge of monitoring vaccines had to deal with an extraordinary dense activity over a long period of time, in order to produce in real time and on a weekly basis, a summary of all the declarations and an analysis of safety signals. The national organization put in place made it possible to meet the challenge of real-time pharmacovigilance monitoring of 4 vaccines with conditional marketing authorizations. Short-circuit efficient exchanges with the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres Network was paramount for the French National Agency for medicines and health products (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) to develop an optimal collaborative partnership. The RPVC network has shown agility and flexibility, has been able to adapt swiftly and demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection of safety signals. This crisis confirmed the superiority of manual/human signal detection as the most effective and powerful tool to date, to rapidly detect a new adverse drug reaction and enable to elaborate rapid measures of risk reduction. In order to maintain the performance of French RPVCs in signal detection and to monitor all drugs as they should and as expected by our fellow citizens, a new funding model correcting the inadequacy of RPVCs' expertise resources in relation to the volume of reports should be considered.

COVID-19 vaccination as a trigger of IgA vasculitis: a global pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVE: IgA vasculitis (IgAV) can occur after vaccination. We aimed to assess a potential safety signal on the association between COVID-19 vaccines and IgAV. METHODS: Cases of IgAV involving COVID-19 vaccines were retrieved in Vigibase. Disproportionate reporting was assessed using the Bayesian information component with all other drugs and vaccines as control groups. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty de novo IgAV from 24 countries were included, mostly in United States (193/330, 58%). Fifty per cent were female (163/328), median age was 32 years [interquartile range (IQR), 15-59] of which 33% (84/254) were young (1-17 years). Median time to onset of IgAV was 7 days (IQR, 2-16; n=256) and 85% of patients (280/330) were vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. Seriousness was reported in 188 cases (58%). Ninety-five recovered (65%) and 2 died (2%). A positive rechallenge was reported for 3 of 4 patients (75%). A total of 996 cases of IgAV were identified with other vaccines. There was a small significant increase in IgAV reporting with COVID-19 vaccines compared with all other drugs (IC 0.22, credibility interval (CrI) from 0.04 to 0.35). No disproportionality signal was found between COVID-19 and other vaccines (IC -1.42, CrI from -1.60 to -1.28]). There was no significant difference between mRNA vaccines and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines. Men and children had a significant overreporting of IgAV compared with women and adults, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study, provides reassuring results regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the occurrence of IgAV compared to other vaccines.

Peripheral facial palsy post SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A regional pharmacovigilance cases series.

Peripheral facial palsy (PFP) is a rare adverse reaction identified from clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA] and viral vector). Few data are available on their onset patterns and risk of recurrence after re-injection of a COVID-19 vaccine; the objective of this study was to describe PFP cases attributed to COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of facial paralysis reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Centre-Val de Loire area between January and October 2021, in which the role of a COVID-19 vaccine was suspected, were selected. Based on initial data and following additional information requested, each case was reviewed and analyzed to include only confirmed cases of PFP for which the role of the vaccine could be retained. From the 38 cases reported, 23 were included (15 excluded because of diagnosis not retained). They occurred in 12 men and 11 women (median age of 51 years). The first clinical manifestations occurred with a median time of 9 days after COVID-19 vaccine injection, and the paralysis was homolateral to the vaccinated arm in 70%. The etiological workup, always negative, included brain imaging (48%), infectious serologies (74%) and Covid-19 PCR (52%). Corticosteroid therapy was prescribed for 20 (87%) patients, combined with aciclovir in 12 (52%). At 4-month follow-up, clinical manifestations had regressed completely or partially in 20 (87%) of the 23 patients (median time of 30 days). From them 12 (60%) received another dose of COVID-19 vaccine and none had a recurrence and the PFP regressed despite the second dose in 2 of the 3 patients not fully recovered at 4 months. The potential mechanism of PFP after COVID-19 vaccine, which don't have a specific profile, is probably the interferon-γ. Moreover, the risk of recurrence after a new injection appears to be very low, which makes it possible to continue the vaccination.

De novo and relapsing necrotizing vasculitis after COVID-19 vaccination.

We describe five cases of severe necrotizing vasculitis following the RNA-based vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including four relapsing anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vasculitis, 27 days (1-60) after vaccination and one patient with quiescent chronic hepatitis B and de novo polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) 21 days after vaccination. Ten other cases were reported to the French national pharmacovigilance database: six patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and four patients with PAN (first symptoms 19 days on average after vaccination). Five of these 10 patients developed kidney dysfunction. In conclusion, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can be associated with de novo or recurrent ANCA vasculitis or PAN. Attention should be paid to patients with known ANCA vasculitis or patients with a history of hepatitis B infection.

Sex differences in adverse drug reactions: Are women more impacted?

Pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology studies regarding the sex difference in adverse drug reactions are numerous, and it is now a challenge to take them into account in order to increase drug safety. Here, we present an overview of this topic through data on epidemiology, mechanisms, and methods used for assessing sex differences in drug safety. Because the literature is extensive, we choose to expose a few examples of studies for cardiovascular drugs, anti-infectious, psychotropics, antidiabetics, anticancer drugs and some specific drugs to illustrate our purpose. Many studies show a higher risk in women for most of drugs involving in sex differences. However, physiological, methodological and subjective points have to be taken into account to interpret these results. Clinical trials must also enroll more women to better evaluate sex differences both in efficacy and pharmacovigilance. Nevertheless, when there is a pharmacological rationale underlying the observed association between sex and drug safety profile, it is now unavoidable to think about its consideration for a personalized prescription.

De novo and relapsing necrotizing vasculitis after COVID-19 vaccination

We describe five cases of severe necrotizing vasculitis following the RNA-based vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including four relapsing anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vasculitis, 27 days (1–60) after vaccination and one patient with quiescent chronic hepatitis B and de novo polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) 21 days after vaccination. Ten other cases were reported to the French national pharmacovigilance database: six patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and four patients with PAN (first symptoms 19 days on average after vaccination). Five of these 10 patients developed kidney dysfunction. In conclusion, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can be associated with de novo or recurrent ANCA vasculitis or PAN. Attention should be paid to patients with known ANCA vasculitis or patients with a history of hepatitis B infection.

Prevention of risks associated with inappropriate use/unnecessary consumption of medicines.

In the code of public health, misuse is defined as intentional and inappropriate use of a medicine or product, which is not in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorisation or the registration as well as with good practice recommendations. Very often this involves an individual or the interaction of several individuals including the patient, his/her carers, prescriber(s) and/or dispensers. Misuse is common; it is the source of medicinal adverse effects for which a significant part is avoidable. Medicines initially prescribed or dispensed in the context of their marketing authorization (MA) can also be the subject of primary dependency and misappropriation. Companies which develop medicines nationally make declarations to the ANSM (French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products) and implement measures to limit non-compliant use of their products. Recently, the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the influence and societal impact of drug misuse. The finding of the existence of systemic misuse, the impossibility of proposing simple solutions leads us to propose two main areas for improved information and the training of users and health professionals in medicines in the context of multi-faceted interventions: prevention of misuse on the one hand and its identification and treatment on the other hand.

French organization for the pharmacovigilance of COVID-19 vaccines: A major challenge.

In this special issue, we present the main highlights of the first weeks of pharmacovigilance monitoring of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in this unprecedented situation in France: the deployment of a vaccination during an epidemic period with the aim of vaccinating the entire population and the intense pharmacovigilance and surveillance of these vaccines still under conditional marketing authorizations. In this unprecedented situation, the cross approach and interaction between the French pharmacovigilance network and French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) has been optimized to provide a real-time safety related to COVID-19 vaccines. Every week, pair of regional pharmacovigilance centers gathered safety data from the French pharmacovigilance network, to acutely expertise all the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported with each COVID-19 vaccine within a direct circuit with ANSM. Results of this expertise are presented and discussed with ANSM in order to raise safety signals and take appropriate measures if necessary. These reports are then published online. At the 25th of March 2021, more than 9 815 000 doses were injected and 20,265 ADRs were reported, mostly non-serious (76%). Several potential or confirmed signals were raised at the european level for those vaccines and others ADRs are under special attentions. This underlines the adaptiveness of the French pharmacovigilance system to both the identification of new patient profiles experiencing ADRs and the evolution of the vaccine strategy. Such an efficiency is necessary to manage a careful and acute surveillance of these new COVID-19 vaccines for and to face the pandemic at the same time.

French Pharmacovigilance Public System and COVID-19 Pandemic.

The current COVID-19 pandemic is an exceptional health situation including for drug use. As there was no known effective drug for COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, different candidates were proposed. In this short article, we present the French public pharmacovigilance activities during this health crisis. Although COVID-19 is a confounding factor per se, owing to its potential for multi-organ damage including the heart and kidney, the quality of the transmitted data in adverse drug reaction reports, the timeliness of feedback from clinicians, and the real-time pharmacological and medical analysis by the French network of the regional pharmacovigilance centers made it possible to swiftly identify relevant safety signals. The French National Agency of Medicine was thus able to validate the data and convey their findings very early. This decentralized organization based on medical and pharmacological evaluation of case reports has proven to be efficient and responsive in this unique and challenging healthcare emergency.

Genesis of an emergency public drug information website by the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 16, 2020, the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics put online a national Question and Answer (Q&A) website, https://sfpt-fr.org/covid19 on the proper use of drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The working group 'Drugs and COVID-19' was composed of a scientific council, an editorial team, and experts in the field. The first questions were posted online during the first evening of home-confinement in France, March 17, 2020. Six weeks later, 140 Q&As have been posted. Questions on the controversial use of hydroxychloroquine and to a lesser extent concerning azithromycin have been the most consulted Q&As. Q&As have been consulted 226 014 times in 41 days. This large visibility was obtained through an early communication on Twitter, Facebook, traditional print, and web media. In addition, an early communication through the French Ministry of Health and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety ANSM had a large impact in terms of daily number of views. There is a pressing need to sustain a public drug information service combining the expertise of scholarly pharmacology societies, pharmacovigilance network, and the Ministry of Health to quickly provide understandable, clear, expert answers to the general population's concerns regarding COVID-19 and drug use and to counter fake news.